
I know we live in the times of Textese. I get the ROFLs, TTYLs and IDKs. After all, a teeny tiny keypad deserves teeny tiny language (even though there’s predictive text and qwerty keypads). I do get it. It saves time, and has its own, well, graphic charm. I can feel the mirth of an LOL, the wide-eyedness of an OMG and the indignation of a WTF. And I enjoy using all of these.
I saw a very compelling TED.com talk by John McWhorter* (hadn’t heard of him till I saw the talk and still not sure who he really is, but it was a good talk) in favour of SMS/Text-speak as an evolution of language that has brought closer the written and spoken word. And he makes a great point.
I appreciate the cultural and linguistic progressiveness of texting. But it’s for TEXTING and maybe casual instant messaging only.
When this language permeates official communication and, sometimes, even speech, I think it’s time to draw the line.
‘
I wl b at d site. Pl mt me dere’ – Senior Executive to me. This is an incredibly articulate man, who speaks very well. But this is how he writes all his emails.
Another example is communication in abbreviations, ‘
PFA FYR JDs & BSCs’.
Again, this is official communication. And it reads like an eye test.
Another client thinks it’s ok to send smileys and thumbs-ups in lieu of approvals or acknowledgement.
How about the client who thinks it’s ok to respond to my emailed proposal via whatsapp saying, ‘
KEWL’.
In these days of haste, we seem to have lost the art of penmanship (keymanship?). The well-written proposal has been whittled down to crisp bullet points. Appreciative Thank Yous have made way for the curt ‘tx’. Warm regards have been ‘
RE‘placed. Emoticons do what words did.
It’s no wonder that fewer and fewer people read books. There are just too many words in them. Maybe next we can abbreviate the dictionary.
*In case you want to watch the John McWhorter TEDTalk: http://on.ted.com/McWhorter